A doxastic behavioral characterization of generalized backward induction
نویسنده
چکیده
We investigate an extension of the notion of backward induction to dynamic games with imperfect information and provide a doxastic characterization of it. Extensions of the idea of backward induction were proposed by [1] and later by [2], who also provided a doxastic characterization in terms of the notion of common belief of future rationality. The characterization we propose, although differently formulated, is conceptually the same as Perea’s and so is the generalization of backward induction. The novelty of this contribution lies in the models that we use, which are dynamic, behavioral models where strategies play no role and the only beliefs that are specified are the actual beliefs of the players at the time of choice. Thus players’ beliefs are modeled as temporal, rather than conditional, beliefs and rationality is defined in terms of actual choices, rather than hypothetical plans.
منابع مشابه
Working Paper Series An epistemic characterization of generalized backward induction
We investigate the extension of backward-induction to von Neumann extensive games (where information sets have a synchronous structure) and provide an epistemic characterization of it. Extensions of the idea of backwardinduction were proposed by Penta (2009) and later by Perea (2013), who also provided an epistemic characterization in terms of the notion of common belief in future rationality. ...
متن کاملDoxastic Paradox and Reputation Effects in Iterated Games
The "chain-store paradox" of Reinhard Sehen is one of a number of scenarios involving the finite repetition of a certain kind of sub-game about which a paradoxical conclusion can be derived. In each of these cases, a backward-induction argument is used to prove that it is futile to try to establish a reputation for cooperative or punitive behavior through appropriate action in the early stages ...
متن کاملWhen all is done but not (yet) said: Dynamic rationality in extensive games
The jury is still out concerning the epistemic conditions for backward induction, the “oldest idea in game theory” ([2, p. 635]). Aumann [2] and Stalnaker [31] take contradictory positions in the debate: Aumann claims that common ‘knowledge’ of ‘rationality’ in a game of perfect information entails the backward-induction solution; Stalnaker that it does not.1 Of course there is nothing wrong wi...
متن کاملBackward Induction and Subgame Perfection . The justi fi cation of a “ folk algorithm . ”
I introduce axiomatically infinite sequential games that extend von Neumann and Kuhn’s classic axiomatic frameworks. Within this setup, I define a modified backward induction procedure that is applicable to all games. A strategy profile that survives backward pruning is called a backward induction equilibrium (BIE). The main result compares the sets of BIE and subgame perfect equilibria (SPE). ...
متن کاملTwo Types of Belief Report
Ascriptions of belief and other doxastic propositional attitudes are commonly interpreted as quantifying over a set of possible worlds constituting doxastic alternatives for the belief experiencer. Katz (2000, 2003, 2008) has argued that belief predicates and other stative attitude predicates, along with stative predicates generally, lack a Davidsonian event argument and therefore do not report...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 88 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014